AuDiR: Diagnosing Audio Reasoning with Rule and Percept Interventions

Answer accuracy alone does not distinguish failures in acoustic perception, rule knowledge, and rule application. AuDiR (Audio Diagnostic Reasoning) examines these distinctions through controlled input interventions. Each item contains an audio clip, a multiple-choice question, a task-general rule, and a textual description of the acoustic observations needed to answer. Three conditions progressively supply the rule and observations; a fourth removes the audio while retaining the question and rule. The first correct diagnostic condition assigns an operational response label, without identifying a unique internal cause. The current benchmark contains 201 items in 18 families drawn from 9 sources, with answer references documented separately from percept extraction. In a preliminary evaluation of Gemini-3.8-flash, accuracy is 29.3% without supplied information, 31.3% with the rule, and 98.5% with the observations also supplied. No-audio accuracy is 23.9%, with a confidence interval containing the 25.0% chance rate. A family-level knowledge probe associates incomplete rule recall with larger gains from rule provision. These results show the benefit of supplying acoustic observations as text, while incomplete validation, possible recognition shortcuts, and non-monotonic responses limit stronger failure-attribution claims.